still controversy about G: apparently the argument never seems to lose appeal. We talked about on these pages just a month ago, bringing a ' interview with sexologist Vincenzo Puppo, whereby the G-spot not exist, and indeed, the same article in which Dr. Grafenberg he would talk scientifically for the first time 50 years ago was in fact manipulated. A theory certainly very interesting, to be added to the sea of \u200b\u200bcontroversy and discussion (more or less scientific) concerning the existence of this elusive erogenous zone in her body.
Just a few days ago the publication dates of yet research in this regard. This time apparently was proved sceintificamente the nonexistence
Tim Spector, one of the medical team that carried out the research, said that in fact there is no real evidence of the existence of the G-spot Short fiction. point G. But first things first. The research in question was conducted by a group of scientists at King's College London researchers, led by Andrea Burri. From this research, was that the G spot does not exist and is merely the result of fantasy, a myth, and probably also the result of suggestion provoked by the words of magazines and the like.
Just a few days ago the publication dates of yet research in this regard. This time apparently was proved sceintificamente the nonexistence
Tim Spector, one of the medical team that carried out the research, said that in fact there is no real evidence of the existence of the G-spot Short fiction. point G. But first things first. The research in question was conducted by a group of scientists at King's College London researchers, led by Andrea Burri. From this research, was that the G spot does not exist and is merely the result of fantasy, a myth, and probably also the result of suggestion provoked by the words of magazines and the like.
The research was conducted on about 900 pairs of twins . It was decided to work with twins on the assumption that scientific monozygotic twins share the same genes . Despite this, many pairs of identical twins were found where one of the sisters claimed to have the G-spot, while the other is not. According to scientists at King's College this fact only confirms the belief that they have a G spot is only fruit of the imagination, and to be added to the objective fact that nobody has been able to empirically identify this elusive G-spot Many times it happens that the ' autoconvincersi not to have become an excuse or an alibi in the face of an unsatisfactory sex life. Immediately after the publication of research was no lack of controversy reactions. Among the first to fight the English sexologist Beverly Whipple, a great supporter of the existence of the G-spot According to sexologist research conducted in London would make water from all sides because it would not take into account variable factors and subjective factors, such as having different partners.
to launch against the British research also Italian researcher Emmanuele Jannini , rose in the news not long ago to have "photographed" the G-spot According Jannini it would be just the setting of research to be wrong: who said that the presence of the G spot is dependent on genetic factors? Nonsarebbe more sensible to think that depends on hormonal factors? This consideration actually goes to demolish the study based on the observation of female twins.
Something tells us that this latest research rather than to clarify on the issue, will only raise many controversies ...
Source: Ansa.it 
0 comments:
Post a Comment